<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tropopause folding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://glidemet.co.uk/?feed=rss2&#038;p=679" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://glidemet.co.uk/?p=679</link>
	<description>Gliding weather forecasts for England and Wales, updated by 8.30pm</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 21:56:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gogo</title>
		<link>http://glidemet.co.uk/?p=679&#038;cpage=1#comment-1759</link>
		<dc:creator>gogo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 09:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glidemet.co.uk/?p=679#comment-1759</guid>
		<description>an updated plotting rasp viewer has been uploaded to the same link as previously posted: http://gogomu.zoomshare.com/files/UKRV2_8.zip

Thanks to Paul R for catching the bug with windows Vista (and also to Glidemet)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>an updated plotting rasp viewer has been uploaded to the same link as previously posted:&nbsp;<a href="http://gogomu.zoomshare.com/files/UKRV2_8.zip" rel="nofollow">http://gogomu.zoomshare.com/files/UKRV2_8.zip</a></p>
<p>Thanks to Paul R for catching the bug with windows Vista (and also to&nbsp;Glidemet)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://glidemet.co.uk/?p=679&#038;cpage=1#comment-1758</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 20:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glidemet.co.uk/?p=679#comment-1758</guid>
		<description>We had a few 300s from Booker today. 

Owain and I snuck round a rather difficult north/south double O/R, but Tony and Denis went further east and found better if not perfect conditions. 

So the spreadout was frontal? Well it was rather strange (the graphics seem to have corrupted Glidemet, so I cannot read the theory, but it was interesting in that what looked like the end of the day actually cycled quite quickly with the overall spreadout disappearing after the ground based thermals were reforming, not the other way around. 

The spreadout definitely came from the convective layer rather than from some upper system, though perhaps the front brought with it some change in the inversion. Certainly by the end of the day it was booming locally again, and it seemed rather embarrassing to be talking of a 65kph struggle when those flying locally were getting good climbs to some great looking clouds...

Still, better than real work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We had a few 300s from Booker&nbsp;today. </p>
<p>Owain and I snuck round a rather difficult north/south double O/R, but Tony and Denis went further east and found better if not perfect&nbsp;conditions. </p>
<p>So the spreadout was frontal? Well it was rather strange (the graphics seem to have corrupted Glidemet, so I cannot read the theory, but it was interesting in that what looked like the end of the day actually cycled quite quickly with the overall spreadout disappearing after the ground based thermals were reforming, not the other way&nbsp;around. </p>
<p>The spreadout definitely came from the convective layer rather than from some upper system, though perhaps the front brought with it some change in the inversion. Certainly by the end of the day it was booming locally again, and it seemed rather embarrassing to be talking of a 65kph struggle when those flying locally were getting good climbs to some great looking&nbsp;clouds&#8230;</p>
<p>Still, better than real&nbsp;work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://glidemet.co.uk/?p=679&#038;cpage=1#comment-1756</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 20:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glidemet.co.uk/?p=679#comment-1756</guid>
		<description>Cor this weekend is a nightmare. I have failed to find good agreement yet. ARL forecast soundings, USAF synoptics and RASP both suggest (for Lasham area) good Saturday not so good and going frontal on Sunday. Met Office website, Glidemet, Dunstable, Parham and Bracknell synoptics are the other way round! Cloudy and rain Sat and better Sunday.

So how do you tell who is correct? Confuscius!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cor this weekend is a nightmare. I have failed to find good agreement yet. ARL forecast soundings, USAF synoptics and RASP both suggest (for Lasham area) good Saturday not so good and going frontal on Sunday. Met Office website, Glidemet, Dunstable, Parham and Bracknell synoptics are the other way round! Cloudy and rain Sat and better&nbsp;Sunday.</p>
<p>So how do you tell who is correct?&nbsp;Confuscius!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
